<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Social Image &#187; blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialimg.com/tag/blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialimg.com</link>
	<description>navigating the waters of Social Media Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 23:01:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>19 Reasons You Should Blog and Not Just Tweet</title>
		<link>http://socialimg.com/2009/08/19-reasons-you-should-blog-and-not-just-tweet/</link>
		<comments>http://socialimg.com/2009/08/19-reasons-you-should-blog-and-not-just-tweet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gurus Around the Web</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[facts and stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech lo' down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialimg.com/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coffee and Adam Singer&#8217;s blog.  It&#8217;s a great way to start your day.  here&#8217;s a post from Adam: Unscientific observation:  most bloggers use Twitter, but many Twitter users do not blog. Twitter is popular because it is easy.  It is easy to setup, easy to copy-paste links into, and easy to write 140 character bits.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coffee and Adam Singer&#8217;s blog.  It&#8217;s a great way to start your day.  here&#8217;s a post from Adam:<br />
<img src="http://thefuturebuzz.com/pics/blog.png" alt="null" /></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #3366ff;">Unscientific observation:  most bloggers use Twitter, but many Twitter users do not blog.</span><br />
</strong><br />
Twitter is popular because it is easy.  It is easy to setup, easy to copy-paste links into, and easy to write 140 character bits.  But, having your own blog remains the strongest platform if you’re serious about sharing ideas and having a continued dialog with the world.  Blogging is the antithesis of easy, however it is far more rewarding.</p>
<p>I’m not saying Twitter isn’t a useful and interesting service, because it certainly is.  But it does not negate the real opportunity that is actually made <em>more</em> useful by the popularity of microblogging:  having your own blog.</p>
<p>Are you just using Twitter but not blogging?  You’re missing out.  Here’s why you should make a blog your home base and consider Twitter an <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.problogger.net');" href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/10/06/social-media-home-bases-and-outposts/">outpost</a>:</p>
<p>1.  Blogging demonstrates true commitment and passion to your industry that you really can’t fake long-term.  Most won’t be able to sustain it over long periods of time with frequency, but those who do so are rewarded in spades and <a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/10/31/how-to-stand-out-in-a-world-of-infinite-choice/">stand out</a> from the crowd.<a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/10/31/how-to-stand-out-in-a-world-of-infinite-choice/"><br />
</a></p>
<p>2.  Old articles are valuable and still read years later, given infinite life by the engines.  Old Tweets live in archive purgatory where a majority will never be seen again.</p>
<p>3.  Remember, you’re essentially contributing to someone else’s network on Twitter – certainly there are returns, but make no mistake they profit from your attention.  I know you might not have a problem with that because you gain something too, but it’s good to be conscious of that fact.</p>
<p>4.  A compelling link in a blog entry will be clicked; links in Twitter are noise that in aggregate make up signal, but the reality is links in your stream aren’t the same as a post with a compelling link.</p>
<p>5.  Secret everyone knows:  most of Twitter is just linking to blogs and content on the open web.  Being the end product people are actually interested in and focus their attention on is where your ideas will be studied carefully, not in the cacophony of Twitter.</p>
<p>6.  You own your work in a self-hosted blog and are in total control over how it is presented.</p>
<p>7.  Twitter is in a sense social sticky notes, or the SMS of the Internet (however you want to consider it).  It’s snack-sized content.  Are you or your business interesting enough to provide the full course?  It’s telling who engages deeper vs. those who simply choose to engage 140 characters at a time.</p>
<p>8.  Cumulative results over time from blogging, each post incrementally adds value to your site as a whole.  Not necessarily true on Twitter.</p>
<p>9.  Full      analytics with a blog.</p>
<p>10.  Multiple      touch points to readership and interaction (email, RSS, on-site, etc.).</p>
<p>11.  Plugins      let you add pretty much anything you want, can even integrate      microblogging within your blog itself.</p>
<p>12.  Flexibility with layout.</p>
<p>13.  140      characters <em>is </em>often more than necessary – but also it is often less than necessary.</p>
<p>14.  Everyone on Twitter is looking for the next big thing or most interesting piece of content to link to.  Wouldn’t you rather be the big thing than merely another person pointing at it?</p>
<p>15.  These are all just tools to share content and ideas, no more, no less.  You need a cohesive strategy for all of them to drive conversions in one spot.  A blog is the perfect place for that if you want focused attention and to build an interested community.  What if any one network you don’t control falls out of favor or changes the rules?  At the end of the day, self-hosted blog owners control the vertical and the horizontal, whereas on Twitter or <em>any</em> external network you’re at the whim of someone else.</p>
<p>16.  I don’t      even know why some people consider for a second that <a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/11/23/friendfeed-twitter-have-not-killed-blogging/">Twitter and FriendFeed will kill blogging</a>, these ideas are pure linkbait and show a lack of understanding of the motivation of people on the open web.</p>
<p>17.  Careful of how much time you devote to Twitter instead of contributing to your own channel.  Spend the most time nurturing that – time spent in Twitter comes at the opportunity cost of <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.twistimage.com');" href="http://www.twistimage.com/blog/archives/fresh-content/">fresh content</a> to your blog.  You can use Twitter and other micro networks to draw subscribers and interest, but the premier value is in working on your own material in a unique space.</p>
<p>18.  <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/regulargeek.com');" href="http://regulargeek.com/2009/05/07/rss-is-not-dead-it-has-a-usability-problem/">RSS is alive and well</a> – Steve Gillmor and the TC gang know how to write a great piece of linkbait, but that’s pretty much all it is.  Remember, they are in the business of generating buzz, links and pageviews through opinion pieces that ruffle the feathers of tech bloggers, and they’re good at it.  It’s entertainment value but I wouldn’t put too much stake in anything one person or site says, always look at the situation and landscape objectively.</p>
<p>19.  You are in control of when your blog goes into maintenance mode – not so with Twitter or really any free service.</p>
<p>Don’t get me wrong, I do like Twitter.  I’ve even taken the time to <a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/04/09/140-insights-from-twitter/">draft insights</a> from using it as I think it’s a great service, however the biggest opportunity is still to develop a successful self-hosted blog.  This advice isn’t new – but I just got the feeling this week that it needs to be restated.  I know it’s not as “sexy” anymore but it is still far more valuable and should not be discounted merely because the early adopters have shiny new object syndrome.</p>
<p>Adam Singer is the author of <a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/">&#8216;The Future Buzz&#8217; </a>and is &#8220;extremely passionate about computers, technology and anything new that  connects us and allows for better communication in our world.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://socialimg.com/2009/08/19-reasons-you-should-blog-and-not-just-tweet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media, Web 2.0 And Internet Stats</title>
		<link>http://socialimg.com/2009/01/social-media-web-2-0-and-internet-stats/</link>
		<comments>http://socialimg.com/2009/01/social-media-web-2-0-and-internet-stats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angie Robinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[facts and stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech lo' down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialimg.com/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Adam Singer As our digital and physical lives blur further, the internet has become the information hub where people spend a majority of their time learning, playing and communicating with others globally. Sometimes it is easy to lose sight of just how staggering the numbers are of people collaborating, researching, and interacting on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by Adam Singer</p>
<p>As our digital and physical lives blur further, the internet has become the information hub where people spend a majority of their time learning, playing and communicating with others globally.</p>
<p>Sometimes it is easy to lose sight of just how staggering the numbers are of people collaborating, researching, and interacting on the web.</p>
<p>I thought it might be fun to take a step back and look at some interesting/amazing social media, Web 2.0, crowdsourcing and internet statistics.  I tried to find stats that are the most up-to-date as possible at the time of publishing this post.</p>
<p>The numbers presented below should be a close representation of today’s numbers (please correct me in the comments if you find more recent numbers somewhere and I’ll update).</p>
<p>Let’s break them down by section:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.thefuturebuzz.com/pics/49-amazing-stats.png" alt="null" /></p>
<p><strong>Google search stats:</strong></p>
<p>1,000,000,000,000 (one trillion) &#8211; approximate number of unique URLs in Google’s index <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/we-knew-web-was-big.html">(source) </a></p>
<p>2,000,000,000 (two billion) – very rough number of Google searches daily <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/05/how-many-searches-has-google-done/">(source)</a></p>
<p>$110,000,000 – approximately amount of money lost by Google annually due to the “I’m Feeling Lucky” button <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Search">(source)</a></p>
<p>24,400 – number of people employed by Google (December, 2008)</p>
<p>68,000,000 – the average number of times people Googled the word Google each month for the last year (source:  keyword tool)</p>
<p>$39.96 &#8211; the average cost per click for the phrase “consolidation of school loans” in AdWords (source:  keyword tool)</p>
<p>1,430,000 &#8211; the number of Google results for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Robert+Scoble%22&#038;ie=utf-8&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;aq=t&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;client=firefox-a">“Robert Scoble”</a></p>
<p>136,000 &#8211; the number of Google results for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Admiral+Ackbar%22&#038;ie=utf-8&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;aq=t&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;client=firefox-a">“Admiral Ackbar”</a></p>
<p><strong>Wikipedia stats</strong></p>
<p>2,695,205 &#8211; the number of articles in English on Wikipedia</p>
<p>684,000,000 – the number of visitors to Wikipedia in the last year</p>
<p>75,000 &#8211; the number of active contributors to Wikipedia</p>
<p>10,000,000 – the number of total articles in Wikipedia in all languages</p>
<p>260 – the number of languages articles have been written in on Wikipedia <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About">(source)</a></p>
<p><strong>YouTube stats</strong></p>
<p>70,000,000 – number of total videos on YouTube  (March 2008)</p>
<p>200,000 – number of video publishers on YouTube (March 2008)</p>
<p>100,000,000 – number of YouTube videos viewed per day (this stat from 2006 is the most recent I could locate)</p>
<p>112,486,327 – number of views <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQ25-glGRzI">the most viewed video</a> on YouTube has (January, 2009)</p>
<p>2 minutes 46.17 seconds – average length of video</p>
<p>412.3 years – length in time it would take to view all content on YouTube (March 2008)</p>
<p>26.57 &#8211; average age of uploader</p>
<p>13 hours – amount of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute</p>
<p>US $1.65 billion in Google stock – amount Google Inc. announced that it had acquired YouTube for in October 2006</p>
<p>$1,000,000 – YouTube’s estimated bandwidth costs per day<br />
(sources <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube">here</a>, <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/future-of-online-video.html">here</a> and <a href="http://mediatedcultures.net/ksudigg/?p=163">here</a>)</p>
<p><strong>Blogosphere stats</strong></p>
<p>133,000,000 – number of blogs indexed by Technorati since 2002</p>
<p>346,000,000 – number of people globally who read blogs (comScore March 2008)</p>
<p>900,000 – average number of blog posts in a 24 hour period</p>
<p>1,750,000 – number of RSS subscribers to <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/">TechCrunch</a>, the most popular Technology blog (January 2009)</p>
<p>77% &#8211; percentage of active Internet users who read blogs</p>
<p>55% – percentage of the blogosphere that drinks more than 2 cups of coffee per day <a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/06/03/case-study-building-buzz-blogosphere-joffreys-coffee/">(source)</a></p>
<p>81 &#8211; number of languages represented in the blogosphere</p>
<p>59% – percentage of bloggers who have been blogging for at least 2 years </p>
<p><a href="http://technorati.com/blogging/state-of-the-blogosphere/">source</a></p>
<p><strong>Twitter stats</strong></p>
<p>1,111,991,000 – number of Tweets to date <a href="http://popacular.com/gigatweet/">(see an up to the minute count here)</a></p>
<p>3,000,000 – number of Tweets/day(March 2008) (<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/end-of-speculation-the-real-twitter-usage-numbers/">from TechCrunch</a>)</p>
<p>165,414 &#8211; number of followers of the most popular Twitter user <a href="http://twitter.com/BarackObama">(@BarackObama)</a> – but he’s not active</p>
<p>86,078 – number of followers of the most active &#8220;non-celebrity&#8221; Twitter user <a href="http://twitter.com/kevinrose">(@kevinrose)</a></p>
<p>63% – percentage of Twitter users that are male (from <a href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1834131,00.html">Time</a>)<br />
<strong><br />
Facebook stats</strong></p>
<p>200,000,000 – number of active users </p>
<p>100,000,000 &#8211; number of users who log on to Facebook at least once each day</p>
<p>170 &#8211; number of countries/territories that use Facebook</p>
<p>35 &#8211; number of different languages used on Facebook</p>
<p>2,600,000,000 – number of minutes global users in aggregate spend on Facebook daily</p>
<p>100 – number of friends the average user has</p>
<p>700,000,000 – number of photos added to Facebook monthly</p>
<p>52,000 – number of applications currently available on Facebook</p>
<p>140 &#8211; number of new applications added per day<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics">source</a></p>
<p><strong>Digg stats</strong></p>
<p>236,000,000 – number of visitors attracted annually by 2008 (according to a Compete survey)</p>
<p>56% &#8211; percentage of Digg’s frontpage content allegedly controlled by top 100 users</p>
<p>124,340 &#8211; number of stories MrBabyMan, the number one user, has Dugg  <a href="http://digg.com/users/mrbabyman">(see updated number here)</a></p>
<p>612 &#8211; number of stories from Cracked.com that have made page 1 of Digg <a href="http://digg.com/search?s=Cracked.com&#038;area=promoted&#038;type=url&#038;search-buried=0&#038;sort=score&#038;section=all">(see all 41 pages of them here)</a></p>
<p>36,925 – number of Diggs the most popular story in the last 365 days has received <a href="http://digg.com/politics/Digg_This_If_You_Voted_For_Obama_2">(see story here)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://socialimg.com/2009/01/social-media-web-2-0-and-internet-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

